<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colds are a Bit More Annoying than Chickens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/</link>
	<description>Nathan's art blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanscheck.com/blog/?p=31#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I put forth that the flying avian which holds humanity in a blanket of smothering fear is nothing but a manifestation of cruel irony itself. For who but man, I ask, would be so unheeding of the natural balance of things as to destroy one of the few species of bird that could not fly and therefore could not possibly produce this terror?

Yes, the Dodo, I say, was one of our last hopes of reprieve before we will be forced to slave in the furnaces of self-recrimination for eternity. Who, for example, has ever been terrified by the concept of &lt;em&gt;bird walk&lt;/em&gt;? (This is a rhetorical question, of course.) In fact, if one carefully researches the etymology of that long-lived tradition, the &lt;em&gt;board walk&lt;/em&gt;, one can easily see that this is, in fact, an example of the opposite case.

Therefore, people of the earth, it will do you well not to forget this hard-learned lesson. Waste not the penguin, the kiwi, and the emu, lest we be thrown into the darkness, forever cringing at the site of a shadowy wing, or thrown into feverish spasms at the agonizing touch of a feather-blown breeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put forth that the flying avian which holds humanity in a blanket of smothering fear is nothing but a manifestation of cruel irony itself. For who but man, I ask, would be so unheeding of the natural balance of things as to destroy one of the few species of bird that could not fly and therefore could not possibly produce this terror?</p>
<p>Yes, the Dodo, I say, was one of our last hopes of reprieve before we will be forced to slave in the furnaces of self-recrimination for eternity. Who, for example, has ever been terrified by the concept of <em>bird walk</em>? (This is a rhetorical question, of course.) In fact, if one carefully researches the etymology of that long-lived tradition, the <em>board walk</em>, one can easily see that this is, in fact, an example of the opposite case.</p>
<p>Therefore, people of the earth, it will do you well not to forget this hard-learned lesson. Waste not the penguin, the kiwi, and the emu, lest we be thrown into the darkness, forever cringing at the site of a shadowy wing, or thrown into feverish spasms at the agonizing touch of a feather-blown breeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanscheck.com/blog/?p=31#comment-23</guid>
		<description>A tempting theory, but one which proves, as temptations are wont to be, somewhat false. The confusion lies in the fact that flew is sometimes spelled &lt;i&gt;flu&lt;/i&gt; (sort of like &lt;i&gt;drive thru&lt;/i&gt;): people are afraid that &lt;i&gt;the bird flew&lt;/i&gt;. The flight of what bird would cause so much terror, you might ask?

I wish I knew.

Whatever you do, don't panic. Though... it might not be imprudent to stay away from any birds that are... well... flying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tempting theory, but one which proves, as temptations are wont to be, somewhat false. The confusion lies in the fact that flew is sometimes spelled <i>flu</i> (sort of like <i>drive thru</i>): people are afraid that <i>the bird flew</i>. The flight of what bird would cause so much terror, you might ask?</p>
<p>I wish I knew.</p>
<p>Whatever you do, don&#8217;t panic. Though&#8230; it might not be imprudent to stay away from any birds that are&#8230; well&#8230; flying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanscheck.com/blog/?p=31#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Aha! So this explains the whole panic about bird flu!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha! So this explains the whole panic about bird flu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.albinokraken.com/2006/06/colds-are-a-bit-more-annoying-than-chickens/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanscheck.com/blog/?p=31#comment-21</guid>
		<description>The consideration you show amidst your affliction has spared many lives from despair, and is duly appreciated. In return, I shall present you with this (not completely useful) advice: colds and chickens conjoined are a bit more annoying than either colds without chickens &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; chickens without colds, and are to be avoided at all moderate inconvenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consideration you show amidst your affliction has spared many lives from despair, and is duly appreciated. In return, I shall present you with this (not completely useful) advice: colds and chickens conjoined are a bit more annoying than either colds without chickens <i>or</i> chickens without colds, and are to be avoided at all moderate inconvenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
